What is a key difference between fair market value and fair market value in continued use?

The distinction between fair market value and fair market value in continued use primarily centers around the context in which the assets are valued. Fair market value generally refers to the price at which property would sell in an open market between a willing buyer and a willing seller. It assumes that the asset is being sold without any special conditions or considerations that would affect its worth.

In contrast, fair market value in continued use takes into account the ongoing functionality and operational potential of an asset. This valuation method not only factors in the basic value of the asset but also considers additional costs associated with its use, such as freight, taxation, and installation. These additional dimensions reflect the total economic benefit derived from the asset and how those benefits influence its value when it is considered within the context of its operational capabilities.

This approach is particularly important when appraising assets that are integral to a business’s operations because it helps provide a more accurate valuation that aligns with the continued utility of the asset. Therefore, understanding the comprehensive costs associated with using the asset underlines the importance of option B as the correct choice in understanding the full scope of valuation in continued use.